The claim as repeated. Versions in use: "9 out of 10 insurance certificates contain material misrepresentations," "IRMI audits found 9 out of 10 certificates failed compliance checks," "an ARMR survey in 2005 found..." and "research shows 90%."
Where it came from. David Dybdahl, American Risk Management Resources Network (ARMR). First write-up: R&R Magazine, July 8, 2015. Then IRMI Expert Commentary, July 17, 2015 (fetched in November 2026). Dybdahl used a roughly 90% figure for restoration general liability policies from 2012 on, and restated it in 2017, April 2021 and August 2021 ("more than 80% of the time").
What it shows. One client's vendor pool: artisan and restoration contractors working under one insurer's master services contract. Phase 1 compared certificates with the contract, and all certificates looked 100% compliant. Phase 2 compared the actual policies with the contract, and more than 90% did not meet the requirements in a material way. The IRMI text reads: "Reading between the lines, 9 out of 10 of the insurance certificates ... contained material misrepresentations."
What it does not show. It is not an industry rate. It is not "90% of certificates fail review." Certificates passed review in phase 1. It is not construction-wide, and not current. Later repeaters moved the date to 2005, credited IRMI as the auditor (IRMI published it), and in one case inverted the finding. A separate "90%" in a 2025 BOMA session write-up is a speaker's estimate with no study.
Verdict. The audit is real, specific and sourced, and it makes a good point: a certificate can look perfect while the policy behind it does not match the contract. It supports a narrow sentence about one client's vendors in 2015. It does not support any claim about all certificates. One careful repeater, an insurance agency's 2025 blog, quotes the "artisan contractor" qualifier and links the source.
Safe wording. "One 2015 audit of a single client's restoration contractors found more than 90% carried policies that did not match the contract, even though every certificate looked compliant."
- Year
- 2015
- Sample and method
- One audit of one client's vendors. See the figures in section A.
- US or not
- Not stated (reads as US)
- Status
- Claim check: not cited as a finding
- Reviewed
- November 2026
Change log
- 2026-11-03. Added. Checked against the original source.